🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat state that indecision over how to address the issue is causing them unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Historic Churchyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation sets out a range of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure locations. Authorities say it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. My parents wanted this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. People will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves in search of treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Along the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while serving overseas. His mother expressed she lost sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to think this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

An absence of agreement over when and how to handle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families are calling for additional coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to continue for now. Different voices argue the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to choose the path to take. We are here to help support them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to weigh all the options. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need good community discussions to discover the right answers for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, providing a theological perspective on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.